Note: Two earlier, more authoritative accounts of the
Bell Witch legend have been discovered in recent years. The Bell Witch Site
is working to gather and post about those accounts on this page. It will
take some time. Please bear with us. Thank you.
two earliest accounts of the legend are “Authenticated History of the Bell
Witch,” by M.V. Ingram, and “The Bell Witch – A Mysterious Spirit,” by
Charles Bailey Bell. Known as the
“Red Book” and the “Black Book,” respectively, these accounts
basis of many modern-day accounts of the legend.
in 1894, “Authenticated History of the Bell Witch” was penned by Martin
Ingram, a Clarksville, Tennessee newspaper editor who grew up in the Red River area. He became friends with
Bell, the youngest son of
later in life. This is where he
reportedly first learned of the Bell Witch.
Ingram did not release his book until the last of
immediate family had died, pursuant to an agreement with other family members. It was the first commercially published book about the Bell
the heart of Ingram’s book is a manuscript entitled, “Our Family
Trouble,” purportedly written by
Richard Williams Bell, in 1846.
It is believed to be the only written eyewitness account of the legend.
book is written in Victorian prose and is
difficult to read, at best.
In some cases, a whole paragraph – or even an entire page – is
dedicated to describing some small detail that is of little significance,
which leaves the reader thinking out loud, “just get on with the story!”
A vivid backstory is important, but too
much detail will distort the reader’s focus and detract from the main story.
When comparing Ingram’s descriptions to official
historical data such as church, court, military and census records, one will
realize that the "Authenticated History" contains a surprising
number of errors. However, I do not fault
Mr. Ingram because historical research is, for the most part,
a hit-or-miss game – a “paper chase,” if
you will – and no researcher is 100% correct 100% of the time. He also
did not have the advantages of travel and technology that modern
collection of anecdotes in M.V. Ingram’s “Authenticated
History of the Bell Witch” makes for a colorful and entertaining read,
but the book's Victorian prose and numerous historical errors leave a big void
in the pursuit of a serious and historically-accurate account of the Bell
Witch legend. The absence of footnotes, endnotes and other scholarly matter
greatly diminishes its credibility as a research tool.
Key elements in the history of the legend (John Bell's
from Red River Baptist Church, for example) are
conspicuously absent. The book's distinction of being the first commercially
published book about the legend is what makes it worthy of mention.
Ingram book makes a great read for entertainment purposes, even with the
Victorian prose, but readers should seek a more serious and thorough publication if
they are interested in learning more.
other early account, “The Bell Witch – A Mysterious Spirit,” was
published in 1934 by Nashville physician, Dr. Charles Bailey Bell, a
great-grandson of John
Bell. Basically a rehash of the Ingram book,
Dr. Bell's book is more readable and holds the reader's attention longer.
Victorian prose had become obsolete by 1934, and Dr. Bell’s prose
conveys the story in in much fewer words.
There are two major differences between the Charles Bailey Bell book
and the M.V. Ingram book.
the beginning, Dr. Bell goes on and on about his great-grandfather’s good
deeds and wonderful reputation. It
is true that John Bell had a wonderful reputation – I won’t argue with
that – but Dr. Bell overemphasizes it, as if trying to clear his
great-grandfather’s name in connection with some past event, possibly the
Red River Baptist Church ordeal, which was never even mentioned in any
Bell Witch book prior to "The Bell Witch: The Full
Account." While Ingram also pays tribute to Mr. Bell's reputation, he does
so in a more conservative manner, only mentioning it when mention is necessary and not overdoing it. In my opinion, this is a major
difference between the two early publications.
other major difference is the inclusion of a series of “conferences” that
purportedly took place between John Bell, Jr. and “Kate” in 1828, which
dealt with the past, the present, and the future, as well as nature, time, and
civilizations. It was during these conferences when “Kate” made several
predictions that would turn out to be true – well, almost.
My take on these alleged conferences can be found on the
Bell Witch Questions and
Bell Witch – A Mysterious Spirit,” like all other Bell Witch books, has
its fair share of fans and critics alike. Old-timers say that Bell’s family was outraged by
I heard one story about a woman who, after reading the book, exclaimed,
“it’s a big pack of lies!” and tossed it into her fireplace.
I also have heard that certain people tried to purchase every copy they
could, just to keep it off of bookstore shelves.
Why? The Ingram book wasn't the subject of such outrage, so why would this book?
It is basically
the same thing, only written better. I
suspect that the “conferences,” which Ingram conspicuously avoided
discussing, had something to do with it.
line, although mostly a rehash of the Ingram book, “The Bell Witch – A
Mysterious Spirit” is a fascinating read.
But like the Ingram book, it contains its share of historical errors.
Fitzhugh, Author / Researcher
Bell Witch Site